Mobile Discussion
Gamer Discussion
Gadget Discusion
Laptop Discussion
Reviews & News
Photo Gallery
Home Register Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   InterWeb > Everything Else > PC Technical Support

Register Now for FREE!
Our records show you have not yet registered to our forums. To sign up for your FREE account INSTANTLY fill out the form below!

Username: Password: Confirm Password: E-Mail: Confirm E-Mail:
Birthday:     Agree to forum rules 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Zanetta Natal is offline  
Zanetta Natal
Junior Member
 
Zanetta Natal's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Zanetta Natal 
Old 11-05-2009, 01:04 PM
  #1 (permalink)
N.Y. AG accuses Intel of antitrust violations

Cuomo is an animal, he won’t mislay and he doesn’t offer in and he chooses the gullet.
Intel’s in problem here and if more states start doing this, it’ll be vast troubles as well, in addition the FTC.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Nekana Odanda is offline  
Nekana Odanda
Junior Member
 
Nekana Odanda's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Nekana Odanda 
Old 11-05-2009, 01:05 PM
  #2 (permalink)
Well I am of the view that Intel is culpable and should sponsor its offenses. The proof is of the overpowering type.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Zanetta Natal is offline  
Zanetta Natal
Junior Member
 
Zanetta Natal's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Zanetta Natal 
Old 11-05-2009, 01:06 PM
  #3 (permalink)
I too believe they are as well, as over has previously gone down. What’s astounding is that Cuomo jumped the gun here and beat everybody to the blow and that a situation is following Intel. This could obtain very hideous, as not only are situations seeking money, but about priority, this may well be measured low hanging fruit.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Zanita Xever is offline  
Zanita Xever
Junior Member
 
Zanita Xever's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Zanita Xever 
Old 11-05-2009, 01:07 PM
  #4 (permalink)
Absolute BS proceedings. AMD couldn't accomplish their supply channels in that age in malice of the refund offers so how can you claim indemnity? I am reassured that our government is so well tuned and has all important look after to the point they have the reserves to effort crippling yet another company. What next? A CPU czar?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Zanetta Natal is offline  
Zanetta Natal
Junior Member
 
Zanetta Natal's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Zanetta Natal 
Old 11-05-2009, 01:08 PM
  #5 (permalink)
Yeah, it’s all regarding AMD here, not Intel in any way. Its akin to a 300 pound guy whipping the crap out a 120 pounder, hey, this is ok, he couldn’t a retaliated anyhow, he only goes 120 pounds, so why charge the big man?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Bembe Veto is offline  
Bembe Veto
Junior Member
 
Bembe Veto's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Bembe Veto 
Old 11-05-2009, 01:09 PM
  #6 (permalink)
I still discover it motivating how they wait so extended to do it. We heard of this a while ago then after AMD fall the FAB plans for N.Y. it departed. I deduction its back now and they will culpability Intel for AMD not structure the FAB when its clear that AMD determined to go the 'buy ATI' route in its place.

Oh well. We will observe how it goes later. Of course if they wholly screw Intel to the point that they lose money sufficient to cut thousands of US based jobs, wouldn't that be the conflicting of what we want right now?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Zanetta Natal is offline  
Zanetta Natal
Junior Member
 
Zanetta Natal's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Zanetta Natal 
Old 11-05-2009, 01:10 PM
  #7 (permalink)
My point should be clear, as in both situations, I’m annoying to say, despite of the conditions, prohibited activity shouldn’t go without punishment and if this were people or another company, numerous this would be outmoded, and no one would difficulty shielding this type of thing, but it bears to point out how some will go to some ends to protect their choices.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Adana Guiomar is offline  
Adana Guiomar
Junior Member
 
Adana Guiomar's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Adana Guiomar 
Old 11-05-2009, 01:11 PM
  #8 (permalink)
Criminal activity... had Intel not had a hostile company program, AMD most likely would have previously been sued out of survival for breech of contract. If they couldn't supply their trickle of CPU's into the profitable line and remain up, they positively would have been in deep problem if they would have directed a bigger piece of the pie. I do remember how excited we would acquire to see AMD SKU's for top end workstations only to find out no CPU's in house. As a rabid AMD fan then it was infuriating since at the time the P4's were rubbish and the Extremes were just ajar junk. The product was never the problem; it was getting adequate of it to bother messing with. Paint it any delusional color you desire but AMD really did weakly in that time border on their end. Convenient to forget it now but many recognize how that stuff went down lol.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Zanetta Natal is offline  
Zanetta Natal
Junior Member
 
Zanetta Natal's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Zanetta Natal 
Old 11-05-2009, 01:12 PM
  #9 (permalink)
Has not anything to perform with AMDs behavior here in any way Period. They aren’t the ones flouting laws, they’re the incorrect fully done here, or have people determined different?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Malita Gitana is offline  
Malita Gitana
Junior Member
 
Malita Gitana's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Malita Gitana 
Old 11-05-2009, 01:13 PM
  #10 (permalink)
We could converse believable situations but at the end of the day we're absent with laws which were broken. I have seen enough evidence from one source (a large computer OEM which was subpoena’s) to warrant devising an opinion on the subject (my myself it is a personal view after all). That opinion is that Intel is culpable of the charges laid alongside it.

My view could be wrong. I am finally formulating a supposition derived from evidence I have seen and the background of this evidence could prove or else.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should I buy Intel or AMD Brett clerk PC Technical Support 13 09-18-2009 10:39 AM
The Best Intel p55 motherboards Woody.Allen PC Technical Support 0 08-09-2009 04:51 PM
Intel 3.0 USB Key poonam PC News 0 07-23-2008 11:34 AM
Intel iPhone babita Other Brands 0 07-23-2008 10:49 AM
Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 955 (Intel Presler) CPU released Albrecht Other Gadget 0 03-04-2008 08:44 AM


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 05:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright InterwebAd Management by RedTyger

SEO by SubmitEdge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219