Mobile Discussion
Gamer Discussion
Gadget Discusion
Laptop Discussion
Reviews & News
Photo Gallery
Home Register Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   InterWeb > Everything Else > PC Technical Support

Register Now for FREE!
Our records show you have not yet registered to our forums. To sign up for your FREE account INSTANTLY fill out the form below!

Username: Password: Confirm Password: E-Mail: Confirm E-Mail:
Birthday:     Agree to forum rules 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Ethan Isabell is offline  
Ethan Isabell
Junior Member
 
Ethan Isabell's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Ethan Isabell 
Old 12-24-2009, 04:22 PM
  #1 (permalink)
What type of Processor to buy for my new rig ?

I am presently operating a Celeron Tualatin on my desktop.

I appeared this processor up and I read some quite disturbing things.

I have listened to that it is quite much an OC’ed rebranded PIII, is this true?

And I have been scheduling to build a new rig for a while now and I just got into video editing, what type of processor I should obtain from AMD for my new rig. My budget is under 700 USD.

my following specifications are

AMD Regor 240
DDR3 patriot 133 MHz RAM
gigabyte mobo AM3 HD4200
LG Optical drive
HIS Radeon 5750
Hanns-G monitor 21.5'
SATA II 250gb 7200 RPM
Corsair 450watt

Is hanns-g a reliable monitor product?

What is the disparity between SATA and SATA II? I recognize about the 6 GB/s data transfer rate of SATA II is twice of SATA but is it obvious?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Incendio Corte is offline  
Incendio Corte
Junior Member
 
Incendio Corte's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Incendio Corte 
Old 12-24-2009, 04:24 PM
  #2 (permalink)
I do not know your concern. Is the P3 Tualatin Celeron derived from the P3 Tualatin core? Yes, identical to the P4 Celerons were derived from the equivalent P4 micro architectures. OC’ed? The P3's were all multiplier locked and binned at their rated speeds. Rebranded? I do not recognize what you denote here. They are all Intel CPU's.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Ethan Isabell is offline  
Ethan Isabell
Junior Member
 
Ethan Isabell's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Ethan Isabell 
Old 12-24-2009, 04:26 PM
  #3 (permalink)
I signify, I considered my processor was enhanced than a PIII. By rebranded I destined was the Tualatin Celeron just an overlcocked PIII that git renamed as a Celeron because it was quicker but older?

I am essentially asking more information on this processor akin to what can it be utilized for today? And more information on its arch. If there is anything superior about this part of crap.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Honorato Idurre is offline  
Honorato Idurre
Junior Member
 
Honorato Idurre's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Honorato Idurre 
Old 12-24-2009, 04:26 PM
  #4 (permalink)
Dude why does it issue? Your saying you’re passed that your CPU is similar to a P3; well similar to us it yet sucks as a Celeron. lets say if it was akin to AMD quad core and you discovered it is really crappy triple core then there is sometime to be dissatisfied to be about.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Florita Garbin is offline  
Florita Garbin
Junior Member
 
Florita Garbin's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Florita Garbin 
Old 12-24-2009, 04:28 PM
  #5 (permalink)
It can run office functions. Tualatin was the last generation of P III and Celerons derived from them. Main difference was that the Tualatin P III had 133 MHz fsb and the Celerons 100 MHz. If the motherboard utilized for the Celerons supported 133 MHz people got 33% overclock on those Celerons just by lifting the fsb to 133.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Esequiel Fanuc is offline  
Esequiel Fanuc
Junior Member
 
Esequiel Fanuc's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Esequiel Fanuc 
Old 12-24-2009, 04:29 PM
  #6 (permalink)
Suggestion: you require 500w or above if you desire to run on quad core + 5700. 450w seems to be not sufficient.

PS: I memorize these Tualatin Celeron were once trumple the sale of Pentium 4 s423 based platform and some presentation can yet rival to high end Pentium 4 at the time...and more influential and efficient than p4 Celeron w128.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Ethan Isabell is offline  
Ethan Isabell
Junior Member
 
Ethan Isabell's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Ethan Isabell 
Old 12-24-2009, 04:30 PM
  #7 (permalink)
You’re speaking that the PIII Celeron is really spirited to the P4?

And thanks for the suggestion, its funny people were speaking an efficient 450 watt should be well but thanks for the input.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Crisann Duardo is offline  
Crisann Duardo
Junior Member
 
Crisann Duardo's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Crisann Duardo 
Old 12-24-2009, 04:31 PM
  #8 (permalink)
Tualatin core was hocked p4's sale actually bad until Intel stops it. A Celeron 1 GHz will take a p4 Northwood at 1.6 GHz to compete the presentation. Willamette will have to OC’ed to 2.4 GHz to tie the disparity. So far that Celeron you have was the best processor for money at the time (2000-2002) it completely beat p4 at cost/presentation. But of cause Tualatin p3 is far more than Celeron and yet beat Athlon in many benchmarks.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Ethan Isabell is offline  
Ethan Isabell
Junior Member
 
Ethan Isabell's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Ethan Isabell 
Old 12-24-2009, 04:32 PM
  #9 (permalink)
Could you detailed more on why this is so superior? Like microach, cache and how it was equal to strike a P4?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Gerry haddin is offline  
Gerry haddin
Junior Member
 
Gerry haddin's Avatar
 

Send a private message to Gerry haddin 
Old 12-24-2009, 04:33 PM
  #10 (permalink)
Tualatin Celeron has 64 k l1 (32k+32k), 256k /512k (Pentium 3) l2 evaluate to Willamette Pentium 4's 8k l1 + 12kuops trace engine, 256k l2. Coppermine’s 32k l1 (16k+16k), 256k l2, Tualatin hand down.

For bus, Tualatin is essentially the same as Coppermine in I/O buss as that limit Pentium 3's bandwidth greatly. Pentium 4 trumple Pentium 3 in quad data rate of 400 MHz evaluate to p3's single channel. But Pentium 3 was moderately cheap and maintains the same presentation with p4 that is in much higher clock rate with narrow bandwidth.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Processor compatibility domnic silva PC Technical Support 6 12-05-2009 02:01 PM
Which is a best Processor? colter cool PC Technical Support 8 12-05-2009 11:40 AM
AMD Phenom II X4 965 PROCESSOR Carola Beatris PC Technical Support 0 11-03-2009 09:14 AM
Please help in choosing a processor rob johnson PC Technical Support 6 10-17-2009 12:35 PM
New AMD Processor has Launched Rocky berlin PC Technical Support 0 09-09-2009 12:22 PM


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 03:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright InterwebAd Management by RedTyger

SEO by SubmitEdge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219